Skip to content
Calcrivo

Call Capacity Calculator

Calculate the maximum number of simultaneous VoIP calls a given bandwidth can support for a chosen codec.

Inputs

kbps

Max Simultaneous Calls

22

Bandwidth per Call (incl. overhead)

87.2kbps

Bandwidth Utilization at Max Calls

95.9%

Step by step

  1. Values used

    Available Bandwidth = 2,000 kbps; Codec = G.711 (~87.2 kbps with RTP/IP overhead)

  2. Max simultaneous calls

    max_calls = bandwidth_kbps / codec_bw_per_call_kbps

  3. Max Simultaneous Calls

    = 22

  4. Bandwidth per Call (incl. overhead)

    = 87.2 kbps

  5. Bandwidth Utilization at Max Calls

    = 95.9

How it works

Each VoIP call consumes a fixed amount of bandwidth determined by its codec's bitrate plus RTP/UDP/IP/Ethernet header overhead — this per-call figure (not just the raw codec bitrate) is what determines how many calls a trunk can carry, since headers add meaningful overhead especially at the small, frequent packet sizes typical of voice (usually 20ms packetization intervals). Dividing total available bandwidth by the per-call bandwidth gives the maximum number of simultaneous calls a link can support.

Formula

Max simultaneous calls

max_calls = bandwidth_kbps / codec_bw_per_call_kbps

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is G.711's actual bandwidth 87.2 kbps when the codec itself is 64 kbps?

The 64 kbps figure is just the raw codec payload rate — real packets also carry RTP (12 bytes), UDP (8 bytes), IP (20 bytes), and Ethernet (14+4 bytes) headers on top of the audio payload every 20ms, and at G.711's small packet size these headers add roughly 36% overhead, bringing the effective per-call bandwidth to around 87.2 kbps.

Why does G.729 use so much less bandwidth than G.711?

G.729 uses more aggressive compression (CS-ACELP), encoding voice at just 8 kbps of raw payload versus G.711's 64 kbps — the header overhead is proportionally larger relative to the smaller payload, but the codec's compression advantage still results in roughly a third of G.711's total bandwidth per call, which is why G.729 is popular for bandwidth-constrained WAN links.

Should I plan for 100% bandwidth utilization from voice traffic?

No — reserve headroom for signaling traffic (SIP/H.323), other applications sharing the link, and burst tolerance; a common practice is to size voice bandwidth allocation to 70-80% of the link's dedicated voice VLAN/QoS class capacity, leaving margin to avoid jitter and packet loss during peak load.

You might also need