Red Team Coverage Calculator
Score red team scope coverage across ATT&CK tactics, objectives achieved, detection avoided and estate actually in scope.
About Red Team Coverage Calculator
Coverage is dominated by scope and breadth, not by how many objectives the red team hit — a team that owns the domain in two days has proven one path and tested very little. Excluding crown jewels caps what the engagement can tell you, so the model penalises it directly, and objective success carries the smallest weight because it says more about the estate than the assessment. This is a coverage estimate for planning the next engagement, not assurance that in-scope systems are secure. A clean red team report on 30% of the estate is not a good result — it is a narrow test, and the untested 70% is where the next intrusion will start.
Formula
Red Team Coverage
coverage = 0.30×tacticCoverage + 0.30×scopeScore + 0.25×techniqueDepth + 0.15×objectiveRate, where scopeScore is the in-scope share of the estate, cut by 40% if crown jewels are excluded.
- tacticCoverage
- Tactics exercised out of the 14 in Enterprise ATT&CK
- scopeScore
- Share of the estate the team was permitted to touch
- techniqueDepth
- Techniques executed, benchmarked against 120 for a broad engagement
- objectiveRate
- Objectives achieved out of those set
Worked example
With the default values below, Red Team Coverage Calculator returns Engagement Coverage Score of 56.7. Change any input above and every figure here is recalculated in your browser.
Inputs used
- ATT&CK tactics exercisedaccepts 0–14 tactics
- 9 tactics
- Techniques executedaccepts 1–5,000 techniques
- 45 techniques
- Objectives in scopeaccepts 1–200 objectives
- 6 objectives
- Objectives achievedaccepts 0–200 objectives
- 4 objectives
- Actions detected by the blue teamaccepts 0–5,000 actions
- 14 actions
- Share of the estate in scopeaccepts 1–100 %
- 60 %
- Crown-jewel systems in scope
- Yes
- Engagement lengthaccepts 1–365 days
- 20 days
Results
- Engagement Coverage Score
- 56.7 / 100
- ATT&CK Tactic Coverage
- 64.3%
- Objective Success Rate
- 66.7%
- Blue Team Detection Rate
- 31.1%
- Techniques Executed per Day
- 2.25 per day
- Assurance Limitation
- Broad coverage — remaining blind spots are technique-level, not scope-level
Step by step
- 1Values used
- 2Red Team Coverage
- 3Engagement Coverage Score= 56.7 / 100
- 4ATT&CK Tactic Coverage= 64.3
- 5Objective Success Rate= 66.7
- 6Blue Team Detection Rate= 31.1
- 7Techniques Executed per Day= 2.25 per day
- 8Assurance Limitation= Broad coverage — remaining blind spots are technique-level, not scope-level
Assumptions and limits
- The result is derived only from the 8 inputs listed above. Anything not among them is not part of the calculation.
- In particular, this calculator does not take inflation, tax, fees or charges or compounding frequency into account.
- Figures are rounded for display to 2 decimal places, so totals built from several rounded parts can differ slightly from the unrounded arithmetic.
How these calculators are built and tested is described on the Methodology page. If a figure looks wrong, please report it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is Red Team Coverage calculated?
coverage = 0.30×tacticCoverage + 0.30×scopeScore + 0.25×techniqueDepth + 0.15×objectiveRate, where scopeScore is the in-scope share of the estate, cut by 40% if crown jewels are excluded. Coverage is dominated by scope and breadth, not by how many objectives the red team hit — a team that owns the domain in two days has proven one path and tested very little. Excluding crown jewels caps what the engagement can tell you, so the model penalises it directly, and objective success carries the smallest weight because it says more about the estate than the assessment. This is a coverage estimate for planning the next engagement, not assurance that in-scope systems are secure.
Why does Red Team Coverage matter?
A clean red team report on 30% of the estate is not a good result — it is a narrow test, and the untested 70% is where the next intrusion will start.
What values do I need to enter?
This calculator takes 8 inputs: ATT&CK tactics exercised, Techniques executed, Objectives in scope, Objectives achieved, Actions detected by the blue team, Share of the estate in scope, Crown-jewel systems in scope, Engagement length. The pre-filled defaults are a realistic starting point — replace them with figures from your own environment for a result you can act on.
Should a high detection rate lower the coverage score?
No, they measure different things. Detection rate is the blue team's result and is reported separately; a red team that was caught constantly may still have covered every tactic in scope, which is the ideal outcome for both sides.
Why benchmark technique depth against 120?
It reflects a broad multi-week engagement across several tactics. It is a yardstick for comparing engagements over time, not a target to game — fifty well-chosen techniques against crown jewels beats two hundred noisy ones in a lab segment.
Related Calculators
You might also need
- Kill Chain Coverage CalculatorCommonly used together
- Behavior Analysis Coverage CalculatorCommonly used together
- Purple Team Effectiveness CalculatorCommonly used together
- Attack Tree Complexity CalculatorCommonly used together
- Blue Team Readiness CalculatorCommonly used together
- Enterprise Cybersecurity Health Score CalculatorAlso in Forensics & Emerging Threats
