Skip to content
Calcrivo

Cyber Risk Trend Calculator

Track cyber risk direction over time: period-on-period change, run rate, projected score and time to reach a target.

Inputs

/ 100

Higher means more risk

/ 100
/ 100
months
/ 100
risks
risks
risks

Trend Direction

Improving consistently — risk is falling both this period and year on year

Change This Period

-6.0points

Annualised Change

-24.0points/year

Time to Reach Target

11.0months

Projected Score in 12 Months

38.0/ 100

Register Burn-Down Rate

3.0risks/period

Time to Clear the Register

84.0months

Step by step

  1. Values used

    Current risk score = 62 / 100; Score one period ago = 68 / 100; Score a year ago = 74 / 100; Length of one period = 3 months; Target risk score = 40 / 100; New risks accepted per period = 6 risks; Risks remediated per period = 9 risks; Open risks on the register = 84 risks

  2. Cyber Risk Trend

    monthlyRate = (currentScore − previousScore) ÷ periodMonths; monthsToTarget = (currentScore − targetScore) ÷ |monthlyRate| when the rate is negative.

  3. Register burn-down

    registerMonths = openRisks × periodMonths ÷ (closed − new) — an infinite figure means the register is growing, whatever the score says.

  4. Trend Direction

    = Improving consistently — risk is falling both this period and year on year

  5. Change This Period

    = -6.0 points

  6. Annualised Change

    = -24.0 points/year

  7. Time to Reach Target

    = 11.0 months

  8. Projected Score in 12 Months

    = 38.0 / 100

  9. Register Burn-Down Rate

    = 3.0 risks/period

How it works

A single risk score is nearly meaningless; the direction and the rate are what tell you whether the programme is working. Comparing both to the previous period and to a year ago separates genuine improvement from seasonal noise, and the register burn-down is tracked independently because a falling score with a growing register usually means risks are being accepted rather than fixed. Boards fund trajectory, not position — a 62 that has fallen twelve points in a year is a well-run programme, and a 62 that has been 62 for three years is a stalled one.

Formulas

Cyber Risk Trend

monthlyRate = (currentScore − previousScore) ÷ periodMonths; monthsToTarget = (currentScore − targetScore) ÷ |monthlyRate| when the rate is negative.

monthlyRate
Points of risk reduction per month at the current pace
projectedScore
Current score plus twelve months at the current rate
registerBurnRate
Risks closed minus risks newly accepted per period

Register burn-down

registerMonths = openRisks × periodMonths ÷ (closed − new) — an infinite figure means the register is growing, whatever the score says.

registerBurnRate
Net risks removed per period

Frequently Asked Questions

How is Cyber Risk Trend calculated?

monthlyRate = (currentScore − previousScore) ÷ periodMonths; monthsToTarget = (currentScore − targetScore) ÷ |monthlyRate| when the rate is negative. A single risk score is nearly meaningless; the direction and the rate are what tell you whether the programme is working. Comparing both to the previous period and to a year ago separates genuine improvement from seasonal noise, and the register burn-down is tracked independently because a falling score with a growing register usually means risks are being accepted rather than fixed.

Why does Cyber Risk Trend matter?

Boards fund trajectory, not position — a 62 that has fallen twelve points in a year is a well-run programme, and a 62 that has been 62 for three years is a stalled one.

What values do I need to enter?

This calculator takes 8 inputs: Current risk score, Score one period ago, Score a year ago, Length of one period, Target risk score, New risks accepted per period, Risks remediated per period, Open risks on the register. The pre-filled defaults are a realistic starting point — replace them with figures from your own environment for a result you can act on.

Why compare against both last period and last year?

Because quarterly movement is noisy — an audit, a new tool or a reclassification can move the score several points without anything real changing. The year-on-year figure is what confirms a trend.

What if the score improves while the register grows?

That is the classic warning sign that risks are being accepted rather than remediated, or that scoring is drifting. Trust the register burn-down over the score when the two disagree.

You might also need