Security Maturity Score Calculator
Work out security maturity score instantly with clear inputs, formula shown and shareable results.
About Security Maturity Score Calculator
Scoring the NIST Cybersecurity Framework functions separately exposes the imbalance that an aggregate hides. Organisations routinely invest heavily in Protect while Detect and Respond lag, which produces exactly the profile where a breach goes unnoticed for months. The spread between strongest and weakest is often a more actionable number than the average.
Formula
Maturity aggregation
overall = mean of the function scores; spread = highest - lowest; tier bands at 2, 3 and 4
Worked example
With the default values below, Security Maturity Score Calculator returns Overall maturity level of 2.75. Change any input above and every figure here is recalculated in your browser.
Inputs used
- Identify function maturity (1-5)accepts 1–5
- 3
- Protect function maturity (1-5)accepts 1–5
- 3.5
- Detect function maturity (1-5)accepts 1–5
- 2.5
- Respond and Recover maturity (1-5)accepts 1–5
- 2
Results
- Overall maturity level
- 2.75
- Weakest function
- Respond and Recover at level 2
- Spread between strongest and weakest
- 1.5
- Maturity tier
- Risk informed - practices exist but are inconsistent
Step by step
- 1Values used
- 2Maturity aggregation
- 3Overall maturity level= 2.75
- 4Weakest function= Respond and Recover at level 2
- 5Spread between strongest and weakest= 1.5
- 6Maturity tier= Risk informed - practices exist but are inconsistent
Assumptions and limits
- The result is derived only from the 4 inputs listed above. Anything not among them is not part of the calculation.
- In particular, this calculator does not take inflation, tax, fees or charges or compounding frequency into account.
- Figures are rounded for display to 2 decimal places, so totals built from several rounded parts can differ slightly from the unrounded arithmetic.
How these calculators are built and tested is described on the Methodology page. If a figure looks wrong, please report it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a higher maturity always the goal?
No. The framework's own guidance is to choose a target profile appropriate to your risk, not to reach level 5 everywhere. Over-investing in low-risk areas is a real failure mode.
Why is Detect so often the weakest?
Detection needs continuous telemetry, tuning and staffed analysis rather than a one-off deployment, so it carries ongoing cost that preventive controls do not.
Related Calculators
- Compliance Gap Score Calculator
- Control Effectiveness Score Calculator
- CVSS Base Score Calculator
- CVSS Environmental Score Calculator
- CVSS Temporal Score Calculator
- Insider Threat Risk Score Calculator
- Least Privilege Score Calculator
- Security Awareness Training ROI Calculator
- Access Review Effort Calculator
- Alert Triage Capacity Calculator
You might also need
- Compliance Gap Score CalculatorAlso in Security, Cryptography & Risk
- Control Effectiveness Score CalculatorAlso in Security, Cryptography & Risk
- CVSS Base Score CalculatorAlso in Security, Cryptography & Risk
- CVSS Environmental Score CalculatorAlso in Security, Cryptography & Risk
- CVSS Temporal Score CalculatorAlso in Security, Cryptography & Risk
- Least Privilege Score CalculatorAlso in Security, Cryptography & Risk
