GMAT Score Estimate Calculator

Work out gmat score estimate instantly with clear inputs, formula shown and shareable results.

About GMAT Score Estimate Calculator

The GMAT total score of 200-800 is derived from the verbal and quantitative scaled scores only; Integrated Reasoning and Analytical Writing are reported separately and do not feed the total. The relationship between the two scaled scores and the total is non-linear and published as a table.

Formula

Total estimate

Total = 200 + (Verbal scaled + Quantitative scaled) x 7.1, bounded to 200-800

Worked example

With the default values below, GMAT Score Estimate Calculator returns Estimated GMAT total score of 800. Change any input above and every figure here is recalculated in your browser.

Inputs used

Verbal scaled score: 38
Quantitative scaled score: 48
Integrated Reasoning score: 6
Analytical Writing Assessment: 5

Results

Estimated GMAT total score: 800
Estimated percentile: 99.0%
Verbal plus quantitative scaled total: 86.0
Integrated Reasoning and Writing: IR 6 / AWA 5

Step by step

1Values used
2Total estimate
3Estimated GMAT total score= 800
4Estimated percentile= 99.0
5Verbal plus quantitative scaled total= 86.0
6Integrated Reasoning and Writing= IR 6 / AWA 5

Assumptions and limits

The result is derived only from the 4 inputs listed above. Anything not among them is not part of the calculation.
In particular, this calculator does not take inflation, tax, fees or charges or compounding frequency into account.
Figures are rounded for display to 1 decimal place, so totals built from several rounded parts can differ slightly from the unrounded arithmetic.

How these calculators are built and tested is described on the Methodology page. If a figure looks wrong, please report it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do IR and AWA affect admissions?

They are reviewed but rarely decisive. A very low AWA can prompt questions about written communication, especially for non-native speakers.

Is a balanced verbal and quantitative profile better?

Many programmes prefer balance, since a very lopsided profile raises doubts about the weaker dimension regardless of the total.